How does MLA work?
|
Introduction
|
Passive matrix supertwisted nematic (STN)
LC displays are commonly used for medium information content
displays such as in mobile phones and PDAs because good
image quality and low power consumption can be obtained with
the low manufacturing costs inherent in passive matrix
displays. While contrast and viewing angle of STN displays
have improved dramatically over the past few years, STN
response times still remain sluggish, just fast enough to
follow cursor movement, and much too slow for video.
|
|
Conventional line-at-a-time STN
addressing is adequate for slow-responding LCDs used in
word processors but causes reduced brightness and
contrast ratio in STN panels fast enough for cursor
motion in notebook applications. Conventional
addressing completely breaks down for STN panels fast
enough to show video images.
|
The cause of the speed problem is not the
STN display itself, but rather the conventional multiplexed
addressing method used to drive passive matrix LCDs. By
designing STN displays for increased speed and using a new
drive method called Active Addressing™, it is possible to
obtain bright, high-contrast, full-color, full-motion video
images. The image quality is comparable to active substrate,
thin film transistor (TFT) displays which have much higher
manufacturing costs.
|
The problem
|
With conventional LCD addressing the
matrix rows are sequentially selected with a 20 V pulse,
taking about 1/60th of a second (16.7 ms) to scan (select)
all the rows, one at a time during a frame period.
The column drivers supply the column signals in
synchronization with data on the selected rows in order to
obtain the desired information pattern on the display.
Conventional LCD drive works well with the usual STN liquid
crystal displays whose inherent response to a voltage change
is several hundred milliseconds and thus many times longer
than a typical frame period of 16.7 ms. Under these
conditions the liquid crystal integrates over a frame period
and the transmission is determined by the root- mean-square
(rms) average voltage applied across the pixel; the result
is a bright, high-contrast image.
|
|
The "on" pixel waveform of a
standard addressed LCD drives the pixel to a constant
"white" state (blue line) in a slow responding LCD, but
in a fast LCD (red curve) the rapid decay of transmitted
light intensity after the select pulse results in less
perceived brightness.
|
In order to show full-motion video
images, the inherent STN response must be reduced below 50
ms. The STN response time can be readily brought into this
range by decreasing the cell gap to about 4.5 microns
and filling the display with low-viscosity liquid crystal
mixtures. However, in this case the response time of the LCD
is not much longer than the frame period and the current
row-at-a-time addressing method breaks down; after each
select pulse, the liquid crystal significantly decays before
the next one refreshes it, causing the display to fade. The
display no longer responds to the rms voltage averaged over
a cycle time, but rather to voltage changes occurring within
the frame time (red curve in figure). This phenomenon has
been referred to as 'frame response'. The resulting
decreased display brightness, poor contrast ratio and
increased flicker have prevented the use of these fast
cells.
Attempts have been made to decrease
frame response by altering the device and drive parameters.
Altering device parameters such as twist angle, pretilt
angle, thickness/pitch ratio and gap thickness has been
shown to be ineffective. Increasing the vertical refresh
rate of the multiplex drive has the desired effect of
decreasing the time between selection pulses, but has the
drawback of shifting the energy of the drive signals to
higher frequencies where it is strongly attenuated by the
low- pass filtering action of the panel. The result is
increased 'ghosting' manifested by vertical trails under
written characters and increased power consumption. Another
approach is to alter the relative gain of the row and column
signals, the bias ratio, but this has the disadvantage of
decreasing the selection ratio from its optimum value.
|
The solution
|
Because frame response is so clearly
related to the pulsed nature of standard LCD addressing
waveforms, making the pixel waveforms more uniform should
result in more rms-like behavior for fast-responding LCDs.
Active Addressing drive achieves this behavior by
introducing multiple selection pulses that are distributed
throughout the frame. With more selection pulses per frame,
the amplitude of each selection pulse is lower, and the
tendency for frame response is decreased without sacrificing
the optimum selection ratio. Furthermore, by distributing
the multiple selection pulses over the frame, the liquid
crystal director does not have sufficient time to decay
between the selection pulses, allowing it to properly react
to the rms voltage of the drive waveform for optimum
brightness and contrast. This scheme is generally referred
to as Multiple Line Addressing (MLA).
|
|
With MLA even a fast responding
STN display responds to the rms value of the drive
waveform.
|
Reduced power consumption, too
|
By virtue of the lower voltage selection
pulses, MLA driven displays dissipate considerably less
power than conventionally driven STN displays. The power
consumption of a 4-inch diagonal CGA panel (640x200), for
example, has been reduced by a factor of eight through a combination of improved power
supply efficiency, lower operating voltage of the row and
column drivers and the ability to drive at lower frame
frequencies without observable flicker. Reducing display
power has recently become extremely important in digital
mobile phone applications. The example in the table below
compares the power usage in a Personal Digital Assistant
(PDA) having a 160x160 STN display addressed with standard
drive and MLA drive. Driver chips for these applications are
commercially available.
|
| |
Standard
drive |
MLA drive |
| PDA without
display |
50 mW |
50 mW |
| 160x160 STN
display |
17 mW |
2.3 mW |
| Total |
67 mW |
52.3 mW |
| Power budget
used by display |
25.4% |
4.4% |
|